On this page
Offshore vs nearshore software development is a choice about shared working hours, not distance on a map. Nearshore buys you most of a working day in common with your engineers; offshore trades that overlap for a different cost base and a different way of working. Which one fits depends on the city you work from, so we counted the shared hours for five client cities and eight delivery hubs.
A disclosure first: InApps Technology builds dedicated engineering teams in Ho Chi Minh City, which is offshore for most of our clients and close to nearshore for some. Where the numbers below favour someone else’s region, the page says so.
At a glance
- A New York team shares zero hours of a standard 09:00–18:00 day with engineers in Ho Chi Minh City, Manila or Bengaluru, and 7–9 hours with Mexico City, Bogotá or São Paulo.
- A London team shares 8–9 hours with Kraków or Lisbon and 2–3 with Ho Chi Minh City, rising to 4–5 when the Vietnamese team works 11:00–20:00.
- A Sydney team shares 5–6 hours with Ho Chi Minh City and 6–7 with Manila, which makes Southeast Asia the practical nearshore option for Australia.
- A 2024 study of 12,038 employees found that each extra hour of time difference cut live communication by 11%, less than the 19% loss of shared hours, because people moved calls outside the working day.
- Nearshore wins when requirements change weekly and decisions happen in conversation; offshore wins when the work can be written down, or when the offshore hub is in your time zone band.
What is the difference between offshore and nearshore development?
Nearshore software development means hiring a team in a nearby country whose working day largely overlaps yours, such as a US company working with engineers in Mexico or Colombia. Offshore development means a distant country with a time difference of five or more hours, such as a US company working with engineers in India or Vietnam. Onshore means your own country.
The terms are relative to the buyer, which most comparisons written for US readers skip. Poland is nearshore for a company in Berlin and offshore for one in San Francisco. Vietnam is offshore for New York and, by working hours, close to nearshore for Sydney.
That relativity is why “nearshore or offshore” is the wrong first question. The first question is how many hours a day your team needs to talk to the engineers live, and the second is which delivery cities give you that from where you sit.
Shared working hours between client cities and delivery hubs

The table counts the hours that two standard 09:00–18:00 working days share, using each city’s UTC offset from the IANA time zone database in January and July 2026. A range means daylight saving moves the overlap by an hour between winter and summer; Mexico City and Bogotá stay on one offset all year.
| Delivery hub | New York | San Francisco | London | Berlin | Sydney |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mexico City, Mexico | 7–8 | 7–8 | 2–3 | 1–2 | 1–2 |
| Bogotá, Colombia | 8–9 | 6–7 | 3–4 | 2–3 | 0–1 |
| São Paulo, Brazil | 7–8 | 4–5 | 5–6 | 4–5 | 0 |
| Kraków, Poland | 3 | 0 | 8 | 9 | 0–1 |
| Lisbon, Portugal | 4 | 1 | 9 | 8 | 0 |
| Bengaluru, India | 0 | 0 | 3.5–4.5 | 4.5–5.5 | 3.5–4.5 |
| Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam | 0 | 0 | 2–3 | 3–4 | 5–6 |
| Manila, Philippines | 0 | 0–1 | 1–2 | 2–3 | 6–7 |
Hours of a standard 09:00–18:00 day shared by both cities, January and July 2026. Source: InApps analysis of IANA time zone data, 24 September 2026.
The table assumes nobody moves their day, and real teams do. Its use is to show the starting position before anyone shifts, because every hour of overlap above that line is paid for by someone working early or late.
Vietnam is offshore to New York and nearshore to Sydney

Ho Chi Minh City sits at UTC+7 with no daylight saving, so its overlap with a client depends entirely on the client’s city. For New York the standard overlap is zero, for London it is 2–3 hours, for Berlin 3–4, and for Sydney 5–6.
For a US company, Vietnam is offshore in the full sense. Two live hours with New York mean a Ho Chi Minh City engineer working until 22:00 in the US summer or 23:00 in the US winter. A team can sustain that when the shift is agreed and the rest of the day is quiet; it cannot sustain eight hours of meetings.
For a UK company the picture is closer than the map suggests. A Vietnamese team that works 11:00–20:00 local shares 4–5 hours with London, the same afternoon block New York gets from Lisbon (4) and more than it gets from Kraków (3). Kraków and Lisbon still win outright for London, at 8–9 shared hours.
For an Australian company, Southeast Asia is the nearshore market. Sydney shares 5–6 standard hours with Ho Chi Minh City and 6–7 with Manila, and Brisbane, which does not change its clocks, shares 6 hours with Ho Chi Minh City all year. Nothing in Latin America or Europe comes close for an Australian team.
How much does time zone overlap matter for software teams?

Time zone overlap matters for software teams, but less than the hour count suggests, because people compensate. Jasmina Chauvin, Prithwiraj Choudhury and Tommy Pan Fang studied 12,038 employees of a multinational and found that a one-hour increase in time difference cut synchronous communication by 11%, while shared business hours fell by 19%. The gap between those figures is employees moving calls outside their normal day, which the authors call time shifting.
The same study, published in Organization Science in 2024, found time shifting was highest for nonroutine work between people in close collaborative relationships. That is most product engineering. The work still gets discussed; someone just does it at 21:00.
Our position is that two shared hours is the floor for a team that makes decisions in conversation every day. Above it, a daily standup, a design review and a quick unblock all fit. Below it, run the team async-first by design, with written specifications and handover notes, rather than hoping calls will fit around the edges.
Work sorts itself fairly cleanly along that line:
- Needs overlap: product discovery, requirements that change weekly, pair programming, incident response during your business hours, early-stage work where the specification is a conversation.
- Tolerates a handover: well-specified feature builds, test automation, migrations with a defined target, maintenance against a backlog, work that benefits from the codebase moving overnight.
Is nearshore cheaper than offshore?
Offshore software development rates are usually lower than nearshore rates, but the gap is smaller than the gap between either and onshore, and it narrows once you price the overlap. HatchWorks, a nearshore provider, publishes 2026 mid-level ranges of $53–$66 an hour for nearshore and $27–$65 for offshore, without citing a source. On that table the top of the offshore range sits one dollar below the top of the nearshore range.
Treat any published rate table, including that one, as a sales document. Nearly every page ranking for this query, this one included, is written by a company that sells one side of it. The HatchWorks offshore range alone runs $27–$65, more than double from bottom to top.
The costs that do not appear on a rate card are the ones worth counting:
- Overlap bought with shifted hours. An offshore engineer working until 22:00 for your standup is giving up an evening, and good engineers price that into whether they stay.
- Your own team’s time. A senior engineer who spends an hour a day writing handover notes is doing work a nearshore setup would replace with a conversation.
- Rework from misread requirements. The fewer live hours you have, the more a vague ticket costs, because the question it raises waits a day for an answer.
Rates and fully loaded costs for Vietnam, India, Eastern Europe and Latin America are covered in our guide to what custom software development costs in 2026.
When to choose offshore vs nearshore software development
For a US product team whose requirements change weekly, nearshore Latin America is the better choice, and we would tell you so. For a team whose work can be written down, or whose company sits in the same time zone band as an offshore hub, offshore usually costs less per engineer and suits a process built on handovers.
| Your situation | Better fit | Why |
|---|---|---|
| US team, early product, specification changes weekly | Nearshore (Mexico, Colombia, Brazil) | 7–9 shared hours with New York; decisions happen live |
| US team, defined roadmap, strong written specifications | Offshore (Vietnam, India, Philippines) | Handover rhythm works; the codebase moves while you sleep |
| UK or German team, heavy collaboration | Nearshore (Poland, Portugal) | 8–9 shared hours |
| UK or German team, some overlap is enough | Offshore with a shifted day (Vietnam, India) | 3–5 shared hours with a later start in Asia |
| Australian team, any kind of work | Southeast Asia (Vietnam, Philippines) | 5–7 shared hours; offshore and nearshore at once |
| Incident response during your business hours | Wherever gives you the most overlap, or onshore | Response time depends on who is awake |
If you are unsure, count last month’s calls. The number of hours a day your engineers spent talking to each other live, not in writing, is the overlap your new team needs.
Where the team sits is a separate decision from how you engage it. Whether you manage the engineers yourself or hand over delivery is covered in staff augmentation versus outsourcing.
How to make an offshore team work with little overlap

An offshore team with two shared hours or fewer works when the process is designed for handovers instead of patched around them. In practice that means agreed shifted hours, written specifications, one protected live meeting, a daily written handover and direct access to the engineers:
- Agree the shifted hours with the engineers. A later start in Asia that the engineer chose lasts; one imposed by a contract does not. InApps teams shift start times to cover US handover windows, and the shift is agreed with each engineer.
- Write the specification before the work starts. A ticket that answers its own obvious questions saves a day each time it would otherwise have waited for your morning.
- Keep one live ceremony and protect it. A daily standup or a twice-weekly planning call inside the shared hours does more than scattered ad hoc calls.
- End every day with a written handover. What was done, what is blocked, what needs a decision, in the same place every day.
- Talk to the engineers, not an account manager. Every layer between you and the person writing the code adds a relay, and relays cost the most when the relay has to wait for a time zone.
The last point is structural. A team whose engineers are shared across five clients cannot give you its shifted hours, because those hours belong to someone else too.
InApps engineers in a dedicated team work only on one client’s product, commit to the client’s own repository, and assign all IP to the client, with thirty days’ notice to leave and no exit fee. With those five practices and a dedicated team in place, two shared hours are enough for most feature work.
The question to answer before you compare quotes
Write down how many hours a day your team needs live access to its engineers, then find your city’s column in the table above. If the hubs that give you those hours are nearshore, pay the nearshore rate and do not apologise for it. If an offshore hub gives you enough overlap, or your work runs on written handovers, the offshore team is the better use of the budget.
If you are in Australia, the UK or Europe and want to see how a dedicated team in Ho Chi Minh City would line up with your working day, see how the offshore development centre model works.
Work with us
Need a team that can do this on your codebase?
Tell us what you are shipping and we will send back a scope, a team shape and a fee. No obligation.
Book a free call





