Opens in a new tab

Custom Software Development Services

Custom software development is the design, build and maintenance of an application written for one organisation's workflow, rather than bought as a package and configured to fit. InApps runs the whole thing: scoping, architecture, build, QA, release and the years after. Senior engineers in Ho Chi Minh City. Your repository, your architecture calls, your IP from the first commit.

  • AI-assisted engineering
  • First CVs within 72 hours of signing
  • Your code and IP from the first commit
  • Reply within 1 business day
750+ projects delivered
10+ years building software
85%+ multi-year retention
15+ countries served
An InApps developer at a laptop, with the team at their desks behind

Reviewed by founders, trusted by CTOs

Reviewers include Doug Guller, Founder and CEO of BidBid; James Fitzgerald, CTO of a software company; and Margo Flanagan, Director of Two Raw Sisters.

Trusted by engineering teams across 15+ countries - from startups to Fortune 500.

KFC Jollibee Prudential Techcombank Lotte MM Mega Market Fahasa ADM WorkPac Future Processing HVS Annam Pegas Baiond Fram Simban Trung Son Pharmacy SG
Service overview

What custom software development services actually cover

Is a package nearly right, but not quite?

Software shaped around your process, not the reverse

Custom software development means the application is written for your workflow. Not configured, not extended with plugins. Written. That single difference is why the cost curve and the timeline look nothing like a SaaS subscription.

The work is not only the build. It is deciding what to build, choosing an architecture that still holds in year three, integrating the systems you already run, testing it, releasing it, and changing it once real users arrive. InApps covers all of that with one team. There is no handover to a maintenance vendor who was never in the room.

  • Architecture decisions written down, and yours to overrule
  • Code in your repository from day one, not delivered at the end
  • The team that builds it is the team that maintains it

New product and platform builds

A system that does not exist yet, from scoping to production.

  • Web applications and internal platforms
  • Customer portals and marketplaces
  • Mobile apps, native or cross-platform
  • APIs and integration layers
  • Data pipelines and reporting
  • AI features on your own data
Adding AI to a business system? Generative AI integration
An operations console built by InApps, showing payments, tasks and milestones
Our work

Custom software case studies and the clients behind them

All case studies
The Trung Son Care shopping app on two phones
Pharmacy retail · ERP integration

Trung Son Pharmacy

A shopping app that sends every order straight into the ERP the chain already runs.

  • iOS and Android from one codebase
  • Every app order synced to the ERP
Project details: Trung Son PharmacyPharmacy retail

Trung Son Pharmacy’s customers browse, pay, track delivery and collect loyalty points from their phones. InApps built one Flutter app for iOS and Android on Magento, with a Laravel and Node.js backend between the app and the ERP.

  • Flutter
  • Magento
  • Laravel
  • Node.js
  • Firebase
  • Google Cloud
Read the case study: Trung Son Pharmacy
The Pegas Touristik travel booking app on two phones
Travel & tourism · System integration

Pegas Vietnam Travel

One guest app on top of two core systems. Sales rose in the first month.

  • 2 core systems, connected by API
  • 5.0/5 verified review on Clutch
Project details: Pegas Vietnam TravelTravel & tourism

Pegas Vietnam Travel, an international tour operator in Ho Chi Minh City, sells daily tours to guests on its holiday packages. InApps built its guest app in React Native on a PHP Laravel backend with Firebase, and connected it to Pegas’ two core systems through their APIs.

  • React Native
  • Laravel
  • Firebase
Read the case study: Pegas Vietnam Travel
The BidBid dating app website, with the app on a phone
Social & dating · App development

BidBid

From an idea to a dating app launched on the App Store and Google Play.

  • On time, within estimates
  • Live on 2 app stores
Project details: BidBidSocial & dating

BidBid, a startup in Austin, Texas, is an auction-based app for career, social and dating connections. Its founder hired InApps to turn the idea into an MVP. A dedicated team designed and built the app in React Native and delivered it to specification, on time and within estimates, and BidBid launched on the App Store and Google Play.

  • React Native
  • Node.js
  • PostgreSQL
  • Google Cloud
Read the case study: BidBid
Industries

Where we have shipped custom software before

750+ projects across fifteen countries. The regulatory context is usually the hard part, not the stack.

See the client list
Custom software InApps builds by industry, and the constraint that makes each one difficult
IndustryWhat we build thereWhat makes it hard
Banking & fintechCore integrations, payment flows, customer portalsAudit trails, data residency, regulator sign-off
InsurancePolicy administration, claims workflow, broker portalsLegacy policy systems that cannot go down
HealthcarePatient portals, scheduling, clinical data exchangePatient data handling, HL7 and FHIR interfaces
Retail & eCommerceStorefronts, loyalty, order and stock synchronisationPeak traffic, and stock that is wrong the moment it is stale
Logistics & supply chainFleet and route tools, warehouse and customs interfacesOffline devices and partner APIs written in 2009
ManufacturingMES and ERP extensions, shop-floor and IoT captureMachines that speak protocols, not JSON
Food & beverageOrdering, POS integration, franchise reportingHundreds of sites, one release window
SaaS & startupsMulti-tenant platforms, billing, admin toolingA roadmap that moves faster than the architecture
Testimonials

Ask the people who stayed

Every quote below is from a verified review. None of them were written by us.

4.9 / 5

Across 39 verified reviews on Clutch, where reviewers are interviewed directly and we never see the draft.

Margo Flanagan, Director and co-founder of Two Raw Sisters

Project management has been an 11/10. Always respond to my needs and questions in detail and deliveries have always been on time.”

Margo Flanagan Director, Two Raw Sisters 5.0/5 Read the verified review on Clutch (opens in a new tab)
Doug Guller, Founder and CEO of BidBid

We were impressed by their willingness to overcome cultural challenges and deliver a product beyond our expectations.”

Doug Guller Founder & CEO, BidBid 4.5/5 Read the verified review on Clutch (opens in a new tab)
James Fitzgerald, CTO of a computer software company

They don’t just build what you ask for. They think about the end result, and then go beyond it.”

James Fitzgerald CTO, Computer Software Company 5.0/5 Read the verified review on Clutch (opens in a new tab)

Have a similar system challenge? Tell us what needs to work better and which systems are involved.

Book a consultation
Is this a fit?

Worth the call, or worth an early no

Custom is the wrong answer to plenty of good problems. Here is where we say so.

This is not a fit if
  • A configured SaaS product would genuinely do the job. We will tell you which one, and we would rather say it on the first call.
  • You want it in six weeks and the scope is not negotiable. One of those two has to move, and we will not pretend otherwise.
  • You are still validating the idea. Ask about MVP development instead, which is a smaller and cheaper question.
  • You need engineers to slot into a team you already run and direct. That is staff augmentation, and it costs less.
This works well if
  1. A package covers most of your process, and the part it misses is the part that makes you money.

  2. The business runs on spreadsheets that three people understand and nobody has documented.

  3. You have a system that still works and can no longer be changed without breaking something.

  4. The software is the product, and the roadmap is going to run for years rather than months.

Tick any sign that sounds like your business.

Build or buy

Custom build, off-the-shelf, or low-code

Custom is not automatically the right answer. This is the honest version of when it is.

Custom software development compared with off-the-shelf SaaS and low-code platforms across eight buying criteria
CriterionCustom buildOff-the-shelf SaaSLow-code platform
Fit to your workflowExact. It is written for itClose on the common casesGood until a rule the builder cannot express
Time to first releaseMonthsDaysWeeks
Cost shapeHigher up front, then flatLow up front, per seat foreverLow up front, platform fee scales
Cost at 500 usersUnchanged. It is your softwareMultiplies by seatMultiplies by seat and by run
Changing it laterAnything is possible. You set the priorityThe vendor roadmap decidesInside the platform’s limits only
Integration depthWhatever your systems exposeWhatever the vendor builtConnector library, then custom code anyway
Who owns itYou. Source, IP and deploymentThe vendorThe platform holds it
How it endsWhen nobody funds the next changeWhen your process outgrows the productWhen you hit the ceiling and rebuild

The decision function by function: custom software vs off-the-shelf: a decision framework.

Why InApps

Why choose InApps as your custom software development company?

You get a senior team in Vietnam that works on your system only, talks to you directly and stays with it. Here is what that rests on.

Illustration of InApps’ Vietnam engineering hub collaborating with teams worldwide. InApps headquarters
  1. 500+engineers

    A dedicated team, not a shared bench

    Your engineers work on your system only. The team is drawn from 500+ engineers across web, mobile, cloud and AI.

  2. 72hto first CVs

    Start in weeks, not hiring cycles

    First CVs arrive within 72 hours of signing the NDA and contract. Your team is onboarded in 4–6 weeks for the scope we confirm together.

  3. 92%engineer retention at 12 months

    Knowledge of your system stays on the team

    More than nine in ten InApps engineers are still with us after a year. Documentation, knowledge transfer and replacement terms are agreed for your engagement.

  4. UTC+7Ho Chi Minh City

    Direct access, in hours that work for you

    Talk to your engineers in your Slack and at your standups, with no middleman. Our day sits close to Singapore and Australian hours and overlaps Europe’s morning, with offices in London and Brisbane.

  5. 4assessment stages

    Senior engineers you interview and approve

    Every engineer passes the four stages below. 3% of applicants make it through, and then you interview them before they join.

The engineers

Four stages before anyone touches your codebase

  • 3%pass rate
  • 4vetting stages
  • 92%12-month retention
  • 750+projects delivered
  1. Stage 1

    Live coding & system design

    • Real-world coding challenge
    • System design interview
    • Code quality and problem solving
  2. Stage 2

    Communication & English

    • Technical communication
    • Client-facing scenario
    • Written and spoken English
  3. Stage 3

    Agile collaboration & ownership

    • Agile mindset and teamwork
    • Ownership and accountability
    • Adaptability and growth mindset
  4. Stage 4

    Final review & reference check

    • Technical panel interview
    • Reference and background check
    • Culture and values alignment
By the numbers

A track record built over 10 years

Measured in projects delivered, client relationships, independent ratings, and industry recognition

750+
projects delivered
85%+
multi-year retention
15+
countries served
Top Staff Augmentation CompanyClutch, Vietnam 2025
Sao Khuê AwardVINASA · 2025
ISO 27001:2022Certified
Rated 5.0/5GoodFirms · 18 reviews
Top Dev EmployerTopDev · 2025
HCMC · London · BrisbaneSince 2016
What it costs

What custom software development costs in 2026

We do not publish a rate card. The honest number depends on scope, integration count and how long you need the team. What we can give you is the market. These are 2026 hourly ranges compiled from three published rate surveys, so you can sanity-check any quote you receive, including ours.

Benchmark 2026 hourly rates for senior engineering roles in North America, Eastern Europe and Vietnam or Southeast Asia
Role (senior)North AmericaEastern EuropeVietnam / SE Asia
$120–200 / hr$45–75 / hr$30–50 / hr
$130–200 / hr$50–85 / hr$35–55 / hr
$140–220 / hr$60–95 / hr$40–65 / hr
$85–140 / hr$35–60 / hr$22–40 / hr

Select a role in the table to estimate a team with it below.

Estimate a build team at benchmark rates

Pick a role and a headcount. The figures are the market bands in the table above, at 160 hours a month.

Role
Engineers
Vietnam / SE Asia —
Same team, North America —

—

Market benchmark range, not an InApps quote. Figures are third-party 2026 survey data for the region, not our rates, and they cover the team only. A full project cost also carries scoping, design, QA, infrastructure and the integrations, which is why the honest number needs a conversation. Ask for a written estimate and you will get a real one for your actual scope.

Benchmark sources

Ranges are a conservative synthesis: where the three sources disagreed we took the wider span rather than the flattering end. Compiled August 2026.

Before you budget: the full cost breakdown and how to calculate custom software ROI.

Engagement models

Which engagement model fits your team?

The right model depends on who leads delivery: your team, a shared roadmap, or InApps from scope to release.

  1. Need one or two engineers inside your team?

    IT staff augmentation

    Engineers join your team, follow your processes and report to your leads.

  2. Need sustained capacity for a long roadmap?

    Dedicated development team

    A team that works only on your system and learns it over time. For a full tech department, see our Offshore Development Center.

  3. Need a defined system delivered?

    Project-based delivery

    InApps owns delivery to the scope and acceptance criteria you agree, with a named owner on your side.

Inheriting a codebase you are not sure about? Start with a code audit to find the risks and set priorities before more development.

Compare the models in depth: staff augmentation vs dedicated team vs ODC.

How we deliver

From scoping call to production, and the years after

  1. Stage 1: Scope and estimate

    Week 1–2

    One workshop, then a written scope. We would rather lose the deal here than in month four.

    • Workflow and integration mapping
    • Non-functional requirements
    • Architecture options with trade-offs
    • A range, and what would move it
  2. Stage 2: Architecture and design

    Week 3–4

    Decisions get written down. Including the ones we argued about.

    • System and data architecture
    • User flows and interface design
    • Security and access model
    • Sprint plan and definition of done
  3. Stage 3: Build

    Sprint 1 onward

    Two-week sprints, a demo at the end of each. Nothing is ever 90% done.

    • Working software every sprint
    • Code review on every pull request
    • Automated tests running in CI
    • Your repository, from the first commit
  4. Stage 4: Hardening

    Before launch

    The part vendors quietly skip when a date is slipping.

    • End-to-end and regression testing
    • Load and performance testing
    • Penetration test, then the fixes
    • Runbook, documentation and handover
  5. Stage 5: Run and evolve

    After launch

    The system is live for years. It has to keep changing, and the same team keeps changing it.

    • Support against an agreed response time
    • Monitoring and alerting from day one
    • Feature work in the same cadence
    • Dependency and security upgrades

Each phase in detail, with realistic timelines: the custom software development process.

Keep delivery visible and decisions clear

  • Review working software

    Demonstrations and test results drive feedback on completed work and the next priorities.

  • Make scope changes explicit

    Review a change’s effect on effort, dependencies and release timing before approving it.

  • Agree how the teams communicate

    Meeting overlap, channels, escalation contacts and who approves each decision.

An InApps engineer at his desk, with code on screen

First CVs in 72 hours. Your team onboarded in 4–6 weeks.

Both are counted from the NDA and contract, for the scope we confirm together. Bring the process you need to improve and the systems it depends on.

Book a consultation Our team replies within 1 business day.
Choosing a vendor

How to evaluate a custom software development company

Four questions separate vendors quickly. Ask us the same four. If any answer is vaguer than the ones below, that is the finding.

Ask for the answer in writing. A firm that will put its estimate assumptions, its exit terms and its IP clause in a document is a different firm from one that will only say them on a call.

Common challenges

Custom builds rarely fail on the code

Six failure modes we hear on almost every first call. Not one of them is a talent problem.

  1. A fixed-price quote meets its first real change request in week three. The rest of the project is a negotiation.
  2. Senior engineers pitch. Juniors build. You find out in sprint four, from the pull requests.
  3. Six months of work lands with no runbook. The handover is a Slack thread and a laptop that left with someone.
  4. The package covers most of the workflow. The rest runs on spreadsheets and goodwill.
  5. Integrations were one line on the estimate. They turn out to be half the build.
  6. The system ships. Nobody who wrote it is still available to change it.
Put these to us
  1. Who actually writes the code?

    Ask for the names and the seniority of the people who will be on your project, not the ones on the pitch call. Ask what happens if one of them leaves. If the answer is a resource pool, price the ramp-up in before you compare quotes.

  2. What happens when the estimate is wrong?

    Every estimate is wrong somewhere. The question is what the vendor does next: absorb it, raise a priced change request, or cut scope quietly and not mention it. Ask to see the change-request process before you sign, not after.

  3. What do you own, and from when?

    Ask whether IP transfers on signature or on final payment. Ask where the source lives during the build. Ask whether any component is retained or reused elsewhere. Get all three answers into the contract, because that is the one that matters if the relationship ends badly.

  4. What does leaving look like?

    Ask what you receive on the last day: source, infrastructure-as-code, credentials, documentation, and a build that runs from a clean checkout. A firm that has done a clean exit before can describe it in detail. One that has not will talk about partnership instead.

How InApps answers the third question: your code and IP from the first commit.

Security & IP

Whose code is it, and who can see it?

Two questions decide most security reviews. What stops your source leaving, and what happens to ownership if the engagement ends badly. Here are both answers, in the order legal asks them.

  • IP is yours from the first commit

    Everything written for you is assigned to you under the engagement agreement. No milestone and no final payment gates the transfer, the work lives in your repository under your access control throughout, and nothing is retained or reused on another account.

  • ISO/IEC 27001:2022 certified

    A certified information security management system audited against the 2022 revision, not a self-attestation. It covers the office, the devices and the network, and carries the access control, logging and incident response the standard requires.

  • NDA before repository access

    A bi-directional NDA is signed before anyone gets an invite, and every engineer on your project clears background and reference checks. Confidentiality is carried in their employment contract, and access is provisioned by you and revoked by you.

  • GDPR for EU and UK work

    Personal data is handled to GDPR requirements, with data processing terms agreed before onboarding. Access is limited to what the role actually needs, and residency and retention are agreed per engagement rather than assumed.

What you receive at handover

  • Source code in your repository
  • Build and deployment instructions
  • System documentation
  • Access transfer and a plan for who runs the system next
Common questions

Frequently Asked Questions

Still deciding?

Send us the workflow and the systems it has to talk to. We will tell you honestly whether a custom build is the right shape for it, including when it is not.

Book a discovery call

Custom software development is the design, build and maintenance of an application written for one organisation's requirements, rather than licensed as a ready-made product. It covers scoping, architecture, interface design, engineering, testing, release and ongoing change. The output belongs to the company that commissioned it, including the source code and the intellectual property.

Off-the-shelf software is built once and sold to many companies, so you adapt your process to fit it. Custom software is written for one company's process, so the fit is exact. Off-the-shelf is cheaper and faster to start and carries a per-seat fee for as long as you use it. Custom costs more up front and is then yours, with no licence that scales with headcount. The comparison table above sets the two out side by side, with low-code as the third option.

There is no single figure, because cost tracks scope, integration count and team size rather than a rate card. As a benchmark, published 2026 surveys put senior engineers in Vietnam and Southeast Asia at roughly $30–50 per hour against $120–200 in North America. The sourced ranges by role are in the rate table above. Those are market figures, not our quote. We scope each engagement and send a written estimate with the assumptions attached, so you can see exactly what would move it.

Three to six months to a first production release for a focused system, and longer where the integration surface is wide or the compliance review is heavy. Scoping takes one to two weeks and design another two; build then runs in two-week sprints. You get a range at the estimate rather than a single date, along with the two or three things most likely to move it. A vendor who gives you a fixed date before scoping has not scoped it.

You do, from the first commit. Intellectual property in everything written for you is assigned to you under the engagement agreement, with no milestone or final payment gating the transfer. The source lives in your repository under your access control throughout the build, not in ours. Nothing is retained or reused on another account.

Five stages: scope and estimate, architecture and design, build, hardening, then run and evolve. Scoping produces a written scope and an estimate range. Design produces the architecture, the interface and the sprint plan. Build runs in two-week sprints with a demo at the end of each. Hardening covers end-to-end testing, load testing, a penetration test and the runbook. After launch the same team keeps changing the system. The detail is in how we deliver.

It goes through a written change request, priced before any work starts on it. Every estimate is wrong somewhere, so the useful question is what happens then rather than whether it happens. We raise it, price it, and you decide whether it lands in this release or the next. We do not quietly cut quality to hold a date, and we do not absorb scope silently and bill for it later.

Yes, and most engagements start that way. We run a codebase and architecture audit first, then work inside your conventions rather than proposing a rewrite in week one. Our engineers join your repository, your board and your review process. If a rewrite genuinely is the right call, you get the argument in writing, with the cost of not doing it alongside the cost of doing it.

The team that built it keeps running it. Support runs against an agreed response time, monitoring and alerting are in place before go-live, and feature work continues in the same sprint cadence. Security patching and dependency upgrades sit inside the retainer rather than becoming a separate project every year. Most of a system's life happens after launch, which is why we do not hand it to a maintenance vendor who was never in the room.

It is exactly as secure as the controls behind it, which is why the controls are worth asking about. InApps runs an ISO/IEC 27001:2022-certified information security management system covering the office, the devices and the network, signs a bi-directional NDA before anyone gets repository access, and handles EU and UK personal data to GDPR requirements. Access is provisioned in your systems, under your control, and revoked by you.
Reply within
1 business day
Book a consultation
Let’s build

Ready to add senior engineers to your roadmap?

Book a 30-minute call. We will map the roles, the timeline and a cost range - and tell you plainly if we are not the right fit.

4.9 / 5 from 39 verified reviews on Clutch
No sales deck No discovery invoice Written role map within five days

Send us a project brief

The more of the shape you give us, the more useful the first reply is. If the answer is that you should hire locally, or that another firm fits better, we will say that instead.

Google reCaptcha: Invalid site key.