• Home
  • >
  • DevOps News
  • >
  • DataOps and the Problem with ‘Ops’ Terminology – InApps 2022

DataOps and the Problem with ‘Ops’ Terminology – InApps is an article under the topic Devops Many of you are most interested in today !! Today, let’s InApps.net learn DataOps and the Problem with ‘Ops’ Terminology – InApps in today’s post !

Read more about DataOps and the Problem with ‘Ops’ Terminology – InApps at Wikipedia



You can find content about DataOps and the Problem with ‘Ops’ Terminology – InApps from the Wikipedia website

Almost every trend regarding how IT operations are handled gets an “Ops” moniker: DevOps, DevSecOps, AIOps, MLOps, GitOps, NoOps, FinOps, etc. We wholeheartedly believe that many of these terms explain real phenomenon. However, as is the case with DataOps, the rush to rebrand existing products obfuscates the degree to which these trends are getting traction.

Although there are differences, at its core DataOps is DevOps processes applied to data operations. Automation of data pipelines and collaboration between teams are two of the key characteristics of “modern” DataOps. Yet, managing databases and other data platforms have been a core component of IT’s responsibilities for years. Without consensus about what DataOps means, market confusion will abound. Here are just a few studies that may be used to overstate the trend’s prominence.

We were shocked to read that 90% of enterprises are using DataOps, so we took a deeper look at the underlying 451 Research report, which was based on a survey sponsored by Delphix. The study actually says that 89% of the respondents expected to increase spending, investment, or development on DataOps technologies. Yet, the study provides a process-oriented definition of DataOps that allows any company to say its product or service say it is a DataOps technology. The report surveyed 150 representatives of North American organizations with more than 1,000 employees and a minimum of 2PBs of data under management who had a solid understanding of their organization’s data management strategy.

Read More:   Update The New Face of Data Management

Based on that sample, 71% are already well along on with their DataOps maturity. Just like with DevOps several years ago, it seems that most large enterprises believe they are doing DataOps, but the level of maturity is probably being overstated dramatically.

Source: “DataOps Lays the Foundation for Agility, Security and Transformational Change” by 451 Research, commissioned by Delphix. For the purposes of the survey DataOps is defined as “the alignment of people, process and technology to enable more agile and automated approaches to data management. It aims to provide easier access to data to meet the demands of various stakeholders who are part of the data supply chain (developers, data scientists, business analysts, DevOps professionals, etc.) in support of a broad range of use cases.”

An overbroad definition of DataOps was also used in a 2018 study of “data professionals” commissioned by Nexla which found that 73% of respondents’ companies plan to hire someone to help with data operations. Unfortunately, the study does not distinguish between database administrators, data engineers, storage professionals or a variety of other positions. Hiring more data administrators to support front-end users like business analysts seems to be a failure of organizations to automate and scale, proof of the need for DataOps rather than its use.

An Enterprise Management Associates survey found that quality control is the top aspect of DataOps to the operation of data ecosystems that integrate multiple data platforms. How quality control is defined is anybody’s guess. Automation is the second most important, followed by a long list of functionality that people just assume are related to DataOps. It is just speculation, but we believe that few, if any of the IT and business analysts that filled out the survey respondents were thinking of MLOps (operations for machine learning).

Source: Enterprise Management Associates research, compliments of Stonebranch.

InApps and Lightbend’s study of data stream processing dealt with data pipelines. Although most of our respondents were developers or architects, 43 data engineers and data scientists did tell us about their experience with continuous integration and deployment (CI/CD) tools to deploy machine learning applications, models or systems. Albeit based on a small sample, 68% said they were at least somewhat experienced.

Source: Eckerson Group. The graphic shows the components of a DataOps enterprise solution. Many examples of specific technologies can be found in this post from Data Kitchen.

Lightbend is a sponsor of InApps.

Read More:   Update The Benefits and Drawbacks of DataOps in Practice

Feature image via Pixabay.



Source: InApps.net

Rate this post
As a Senior Tech Enthusiast, I bring a decade of experience to the realm of tech writing, blending deep industry knowledge with a passion for storytelling. With expertise in software development to emerging tech trends like AI and IoT—my articles not only inform but also inspire. My journey in tech writing has been marked by a commitment to accuracy, clarity, and engaging storytelling, making me a trusted voice in the tech community.

Let’s create the next big thing together!

Coming together is a beginning. Keeping together is progress. Working together is success.

Let’s talk

Get a custom Proposal

Please fill in your information and your need to get a suitable solution.

    You need to enter your email to download

      Success. Downloading...